Unity Votes Against Democracy

December 13, 2012 — 10 Comments

New PictureMuch of the 12/12/12 Delegate Assembly was dedicated to teacher evaluations. This isn’t surprising, as the Unity crew knew that MORE caucus was showing up with petitions and a resolution in hand. For the better part of an hour, delegates were told how UFT President Michael Mulgrew is fighting this evaluation battle for us and how Unity is giving its all to protect teachers from the evil machinations of Mayor Bloomberg. You’d never know from all this that it was the UFT leadership, headed by Mulgrew, who agreed to the new teacher evaluations in the first place–without input from the members.

MORE showed up with a single purpose and a single request: that the membership be allowed to vote on any new evaluation agreement made outside of a contract agreement. It seemed a pretty reasonable request; teachers — NOT union leaders — are the ones who will be most severely affected by any new evaluation scheme. We are the ones who will be evaluated on what Randi Weingarten herself recently called “junk science”, or value-added scores. We are the ones who will lose our jobs if this junk science determines that we are ineffective based on a mathematical formula that attempts to reduce our students to a set of variables. It only makes sense that we–the teachers–should get a say in any new evaluation method.

So that, of course, is not what happened.

MORE’s resolution merely called for a democratic referendum:

“That the UFT conduct a broad and democratic discussion about the new evaluation system which would include that: our union immediately poll the membership with regard to the new measures and host forums at chapter, borough and city-wide levels where members can discuss this new system”

“That if a new evaluation system is negotiated with the city outside of a new contract, the UFT hold a membership-wide referendum on whether to accept the system, conducted in the same manner as contract approval votes.”

Kit Wainer, one of MORE’s High School Executive Board candidates, spoke passionately on behalf of teachers. He pointed out that we are constantly having policies imposed on us by the DOE, that we are demoralized, and that we must have a voice in matters that so deeply and personally concern us. Wainer also said nearly one thousand educators signed the petition calling for a rank and file member vote on any new agreement and over a dozen school chapters endorsed it.

It was an elegant plea, but Unity was prepared. They presented UFT Staff Director and Executive Board member Leroy Barr to speak against a democratic vote among the members. He said the Delegate Assembly is a duly elected body that represents the wishes of its members. Barr claimed that the DA holds the authority to make decisions for its members, and that anyone who questions that authority (presumably MORE and its supporters) ought to be questioned themselves.

The vote was 70% to 30% against the MORE resolution. Against a democratic vote. Against the right of teachers to have a say in a matter that fundamentally threatens our professional lives.

Overall, this was a loss for union democracy. Nevertheless, there are some bright spots. In a delegate assembly overwhelmingly dominated by Unity, MORE gathered a significant percentage of the votes on this resolution. Many delegates spoke to MORE members following the meeting. Momentum may be swinging in favor of a more democratic union. Perhaps most significantly, the UFT is feeling the heat and knows it is in a fight for the hearts of its members.

You can help. Let your chapter leader, delegate, and Mulgrew himself know that you demand a say in your professional future. Tell them that you don’t want fundamental changes to our current contract and evaluation system without a referendum. Tell your colleagues and ask them to spread the word.

And join MORE–for a more democratic union.

 

Morecaucusnyc.org

Facebook.com/morecaucusnyc

Twitter.com/morecuacusnyc

About these ads

10 responses to Unity Votes Against Democracy

  1. 

    What a sad day. Democracy fought democracy and voted down a democratic vote. I wish I could have been there. How was the question to the DA phrased? I was at the Staten Island Meet the President function and heard that we are far from accepting the evaluation, yet at the E4E function, Chancellor Walcott stated he felt we are very close with “our union partners”.

    I want to see the formulas used in the pilot schools.

  2. 

    For the life of me, I have no idea how this could happen. 70% of delegates voted AGAINST allowing teachers to vote on a new evaluation? How can this be? Are not the delegates teachers themselves? Do they realize they are putting their heads, (and more importantly, our heads) on the chopping block? What do they have to loose if their colleagues have a chance to vote on this? Is this some kind of power trip? I tried explaining to my fellow teachers what happened last night and neither they, nor I understand what happened. It seems that it was not Mulgrew who screwed this up but rather is was actual teachers who make up the DA who decided that the rest of the rank and file can’t vote on the new evaluation. Please explain the “reasoning” why MORE believes the DA voted against the resolution. (And if the reason is fear of the UFT head honcho’s then we are really, really in a world of hurt)

  3. 

    Changes in the evaluation process touch on a number of contractual issues contained under Articles 21 and 22 in the 2007-2009 Agreement.
    Don’t these issues have to be addressed through collective bargaining and voted on by the membership as part of a new contract?
    Under the “duty of fair representation”, would failure to defend existing contractual provisions put the UFT at risk for legal action by members who contractual protections have been violated ?
    In other words isn’t the UFT obligated to negotiate changes in the evaluation process and then present such changes in a new contract for membership ratification?

  4. 

    Not a sad day but a predictable one. The fight is not over. We must take the fight back to our schools and Chapter Leaders meetings. This is an important issue for the upcoming elections after they try to shove the DOE’s bogus evaluation system down our throats!

  5. 

    The mission is now to educate our colleagues- they are woefully uninformed and purposefully being kept in the dark. I carry on about this issue in my latest post -the betrayal of the rank and file by Unity … I hear a train a’comin’…

  6. 

    Woah! I’m really loving the template/theme of this website.
    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very hard to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and visual appeal.

    I must say that you’ve done a superb job with this.
    Additionally, the blog loads very quick for me on
    Internet explorer. Exceptional Blog!

Trackbacks and Pingbacks:

  1. Remainders: Union votes against voting on teacher evaluations | GothamSchools - December 13, 2012

    […] The UFT’s Delegate Assembly voted down a caucus’s call for a teacher evaluations referendum. (MORE) […]

  2. — Stop Imperialism – Episode 53 - December 21, 2012

    […] Despite exemptions, police and firefighters show labor solidarity in Michigan right-to-work battle ‘Right to work’ for less laws have racist origins US fearing walkout of dockworkers in East Coast, threatening to commerce Activists stage ‘Block the Boat” protest against ship bearing Walmart goods from Bangladesh Unity votes against democracy […]

  3. MORE Statement on the Pending Evaluation Agreement Between the DOE and the UFT « morecaucusnyc - January 12, 2013

    […] the UFT leadership thwarted our attempt to bring this evaluation agreement up to a full membership-wide vote last month, the […]

  4. MORE Statement on Evaluation Plan | morecaucusnyc - June 3, 2013

    […] campaigned for a membership vote on this evaluation system, and presented a petition with over 1,000 signatures to the December Delegate Assembly.  Unity opposed submitting this to […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s