The Case Against Mulgrew

April 5, 2013 — 5 Comments

Michael Mulgrew, the current President of the UFT, represents the Unity and New Action caucuses.

New Action has made an agreement to back Unity’s top leadership in exchange for officer/executive board positions.  This agreement dates back to 2003, predating when Michael Mulgrew replaced Randi Weingarten in the UFT presidency.

We cannot and will not differentiate between these groups. Unity and New Action have exchanged seats and cross endorsed each other. This is the type of back-room deal that epitomizes the dirty politics that has come to define this union leadership.

What has been gained for the supposed alternative agenda of New Action in this time?

Similar to the way that Mulgrew signs onto deform policies, and then cries foul when the effects become detrimental, New Action has criticized some of these moves. Yet, this critique becomes disingenuous when it has supported the leader that took these actions, and then criticizes these policies. When the leader’s core policies are so fundamentally detrimental to the membership and our students, we must ask, how is this stance a credible opposition?

In 2009 Unity/New Action’s Mulgrew signed onto the Common Core; Mulgrew endorsed the extension of mayoral control.

In 2010 UnityNew Action’s Mulgrew signed onto the Race to the Top; Mulgrew made public lies that the rubber rooms were closed –in fact, detainees have been merely dispersed from large ones to district offices.

In 2011 Unity/New Action’s Mulgrew signed onto the weekly rotation of ATRs and the observation of ATRs in substitute assignments. (This was approved by the Delegate Assembly at an emergency meeting held after school on the last day of school, June 28, 2011. No ATRs were involved. The ATR pool itself was created by loss of senority excessing rights from Unity’s 2005 contract.)

In 2011 Unity/New Action’s Mulgrew, without a membership vote, endorsed the Danielson Framework for evaluating teachers.

2012 and 2013, in defiance of a rising clamor for a membership vote on the issue, Unity/New Action’s Mulgrew has endorsed the use of high-stakes tests as the basis for teacher evaluation, a methodology proven to be junk science.

In 2013 Unity/New Action’s Mulgrew has reaffirmed his belief in the failed policy of mayoral control which has led to the closing and/or privatization of our neighborhood schools and has left thousands of teachers as ATRs

Unity/ New Action endorsed Race to the Top

In 2010 Unity/New Action’s Mulgrew said that New York’s Race to the Top (RTTT) application had teachers’ support. But just where did that race take us?

RTTT expanded the leadership academies; it took New York City’s burdensome data systems and network models state–wide, proving to be a failure everywhere.

RTTT mandates constant assessment and data management, spiking administrative costs and depriving teachers of proper preparation time.

RTTT pressured New York State to have high-stakes test-based educator evaluations, resulting in more testing and less learning for our students.

RTTT pushes districts to have destructive turn-around programs, school closings, and increases the number of charter schools.

Unity/New Action didn’t have to endorse RTTT.

13 states did not participate in the last round of Race to the Top applications.

The California Teachers Association criticized RTTT because its “One Size Fits All Hurts Students” and it said that RTTT requirements hold school systems “hostage by their purse strings.”

RTTT – Not worth the costs.

RTTT – Wrecking our working conditions and our children’s learning conditions.
Vote the MORE slate to improve working and learning conditions.
In each of the years of the tenure of Unity/New Action’s Mulgrew, the UFT has failed to stop dozens of school closings and even greater numbers of charter school co-locations. The privatization of our schools has led to fewer resources for our public schools, inequality in learning conditions, and the loss of union protections.

While New Action claims that it supports Mulgrew on some points and opposes him on other points, one must ask oneself: how could New Action be considered an opposition caucus when it will not challenge the fundamental betrayals of leadership that brought about the conditions that they complain about in their literature?

Unity claims they are “seasoned leaders in troubled times”, yet they are years removed from the classroom and their willingness to sign onto failed profit-driven reform is proof-positive that Unity has been the cause of these “troubled times”. They claim to fight school closings and co-locations, but cannot hide from their record of lack of mobilization against these policies (for the antithesis of Unity, please see the Chicago Teachers Union/Karen Lewis’ response) and agreeing to run their own charter school. Unity has allowed our members to go without a new contract for over four years; this is not leadership.

MULGREW/NEW ACTION/UNITY – disastrous management in a time of historic attack on teachers

CAVANAGH/MORE – positive alternative leadership to restore dignity to our profession and compassion for our students

Advertisements

5 responses to The Case Against Mulgrew

  1. 
    Joanna A. Giuttari & Matthew Briggs April 5, 2013 at 7:37 am

    Wow — these points are excellent. My fear is that only people who already support MORE and receive these emails or read the blog will read this.

    Is it too late for these points (specific to Unity/New Action really being one caucus) to be included in a third MORE leaflet? Teachers already know the deal with RTTT but definitely need to reminded about Unity/New Action’s offensive, sell-out moves — especially that Mulgrew endorsed the extension of mayoral control — a hot topic that’s dogging Christine Quinn in the news right now in her quest to succeed Emperor Mike and that still gets people fired up even today…

    I just distributed the newest leaflet to my fellow faculty and staff at Fort Hamilton H.S. (in Brooklyn — special thanks to Kit for dropping them off) yesterday and would be happy to do another round soon if there are new leaflets in the works…

    In solidarity, Joanna

  2. 

    Mulgrew has character issues, too. When I informed him that Brooklyn District rep Tom Bennett told me at a chapter meeting at the School for Legal Studies in February that he was going to get Mulgrew to “beat the shit” out of” me, Mulgrew did not have the courtesy of a response. Instead he had his Baghdad Bob, I mean Staff Director LeRoy Barr, write to say after a secret investigation by Sherlockian Brooklyn Bor. Rep Howie Schoor that “appropriate action” was taken against the fould-mouthed Bennett.

  3. 

    I just received my ballot and instantly checked the MORE Slate. So happy I was informed earlier, by the MORE folks, in two of their meetings about the Unity/New Action Joint Caucuses. I am a true supporter.

    I was wondering if MORE members who are retired, on leave/sabbatical or who have left the DOE altogether have a plan to leaflet schools in NYC, Manhattan in particular, in order to assure that the MORE Slate wins. I would also be willing to do Brooklyn too!

    I will volunteer to do some leafletting this coming week. Please have someone reach out to me so that we can get started ASAP.

    I am in complete support of the MORE Slate, and it is in all of our interests to get the MORE Slate voted in, in 2013.

    Fraternally yours..

Trackbacks and Pingbacks:

  1. Sunday read. | Fred Klonsky - April 7, 2013

    […] In NY the MORE caucus makes their case against current UFT President Michael Mulgrew. […]

  2. UFT Guest Post #3: Reality-Based Educator | The official website of the PJSTA - January 28, 2014

    […] April 5, 2013, when discussing MORE’s case against Mulgrew, RBE […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s