A Call For Fair Discipline: MORE Supports Christine Rubino

May 14, 2013 — 16 Comments

We have, in the past, noted how New York City has moved to fired almost five times the amount of teachers that the rest of New York State has combined. In addition, we have highlighted how the city has spent the majority of $32.8 million (of state money)  on hearing officer fees alone to do so. For too long have we seen our colleagues removed from their duties, shamed in the press, abused in the workplace and silenced by a process that serves only to keep them silent. Today, we share the story of one of those teachers and declare our support of her reinstatement to full duties as soon as possible. 

Last March, the case of Christine Rubino was argued in front of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. The judges’  unanimous decision, released just last week, revealed what real educators had been saying all along: A teacher with a spotless service record for fifteen years should not be fired for making one inappropriate comment on her Facebook account.

Christine Rubino had been fired (and humiliated in the press) after making one single dumb remark on Facebook several years ago. She sued to get her job back in the NYS Supreme Court and she won. The judge sent Rubino’s case back to the original hearing officer for a more lenient decision. The hearing officer then issued her a two-year suspension without pay.  She appealed that suspension, because she felt it was too harsh (so do we)  in front of the same judge who had overturned her original termination. She lost that appeal.

The department however, appealed the original decision reversing her termination to the New York State Appellate Court.   The argument made by the department was that the judge, the one who had ruled in Rubino’s favor the first time (the one who had sent the case back to the hearing officer), but ruled against her the second time had erred with her first decision and that Rubino should, in fact, be fired. The justices did not agree.

Anyone who’s familiar with Christine Rubino’s case understands it for what it is: A classic story of an employer playing the blame and shame game for keeps and an employee, also playing for keeps, who just won’t give up. Wherever you are in this scenario, whatever side you’re on, you have to admit that the case of Christine Rubino is at once breathtaking, captivating and terrifying to behold.

For us, it is unacceptable.

A large part of the attack on teachers is that too much of our lives, both  in and out of the classroom, is held to a level of scrutiny that is intolerable. This scrutiny has but one goal in mind: To create a climate of fear and intimidation among New York City’s  teachers. And teachers’ lives are destroyed as this goal is pursued. The toxic environment results from this fear fear creates is just what these people want and it leads good, proven teachers like Ms. Rubino, to be fired.

Not only teachers, but all workers should have the right to privacy outside of their jobs. This privacy was not afforded to Christine Rubino. If it had been, she would not have been investigated in the first place.   All workers should have the right to due process that is fair and appropriate to the accusation or act. While New York State’s termination process for educators, called 3020-a, provides a due process path, it leaves many infractions undefined, allowing our district, New York City, to pervert the process into a game which serves to publicly humiliate any teacher who, even once, steps the least bit out of line. Teaches, and all workers, deserve a disciplinary process that is fair and provides for support and development of employees rather than immediately turning to the harshest of penalties that can be dealt.

Let us be clear: What she said was a poor choice and a lapse in judgment. But she never had once had an incident of unprofessional conduct before this act in fifteen years of teaching. This one isolated incident does not identify Ms. Rubino as a teacher. Her fifteen years teaching countless students, however, does. That is why the Movement of Rank of File Educators is standing firmly behind her and will be alongside of her through the conclusion of this ordeal.

Regardless of what side of this fence you’re on you should know that it didn’t have to be as complex or as involved or as strange or complicated a story as it wound up being. This one act, written by a woman who had never been in trouble her whole career, generated no less than one formal disciplinary hearing, two hearing officer decisions, two Supreme Court decisions, one Appellate Court decision (possibly another), and very probably, one decision from the highest court in New York State: The Court of Appeals. Department lawyers have made their career on Rubino’s case. Judges and hearing officers have been able to book long vacations with the money they’ve earned hearing and deciding her professional fate. At one time, newspaper reporters and editors considered her’s the ‘go to’ story during a slow news week and many interested parties have spent many a difficult hour wondering where the proper precedent of her case, sure to effect teachers across the entire state, should be set.

All for one comment, made on one day in June.

Pundits take note: This is how the nation’s largest school district treats its good teachers. It humiliates them in the press. It moves to fire them, then fights tooth and nail to make sure they stay fired.

But also note that they will no longer be facing this shame and abuse alone.

We urge the department to accept the decision of the court and let Ms. Rubino go back to work. Ms. Rubino has won her case at the appellate level with a unanimous opinion and the Court of Appeals is extremely unlikely to even agree to hear a department appeal, much less overturn the decision. Any further action by the department would be a waste of time, energy and our taxpayer money -money that could be spent teaching children.  Efforts to keep her fired should be dropped and she return to her to the classroom where she belongs.

We further call upon our brothers and sisters who lead the union to step up to the plate and work out a final resolution with the department -one that includes Ms. Rubino’s return to duty next month, at the conclusion of her suspension . We are not concerned with arguments as to whether leadership is weak or unwilling  to protect teachers like Rubino.  In fact,  given the current political climate, we certainly know that it is no small task.  But when we hear of the stories of other teachers, like Francesco Portelos, and Harris Lirtzman,  we conclude that there is a need strengthen, not weaken, collective bargaining protections for teachers in general, and for Ms. Rubino in particular,  so that one inappropriate comment, made from home, (after a fifteen year spotless record of public service) does not immediately lead to termination.

Advertisements

16 responses to A Call For Fair Discipline: MORE Supports Christine Rubino

  1. 

    Your story leaves out an extremely important case: that of Anthony Trzesinski III, who passed away while waiting for the results of his 3020A hearing, which he won. The arbitrator found that there was completely insufficient evidence that he had made any of the statements (attributed to him by already unreliable students who kept changing their stories) of which he was accused. The entire thing was a setup due to a personal conflict between him and the principal over issues that arose when Anthony was our chapter leader, as well as wanting to give his job to someone else. Even though he had done nothing wrong, and everyone involved knew it, he spent months, and then finally his last days before the hospital in the rubber room, instead of at his school due to the disgustingly lengthy 3020A procedure.

    Anthony passed away leaving two small children behind. The DOE was never able to take his pride or dignity, was never able to convince him to take “a deal” and was never able to shake his surity that he would win his 3020A. But this should never have happened.

  2. 

    Congrats to Christine and her perseverance. She deserves her job back but where was the UFT? Not only was our Union silent but she was forced to hire her own attorney. Additionally Christine’s termination was required to “shock the conscience,” the legal standard, for her to get her job back, an incredibly difficult burden. In any case we have learned, once again, that our Union is not concerned with us preferring to allow the attacks to fly than protect our members’ rights. Shameful.

    • 

      You nailed them. I remember when you and James made a reso at the Ex Bd calling on the UFT to hire paralegals to investigate and support teachers. The UFT lack of support has created a class of private lawyers that people are flocking to.

      • 

        The UFT…should definitely have a full time person on payroll to sift through these allegations of misconduct. There is a ton of money being wasted on frivolous cases. The DOE…should change their motto to..Children first…right after we crucify, demoralize, and blast teachers.

  3. 
    Donna Miglino May 14, 2013 at 7:57 am

    Well, it’s about TIME her union brothers and sisters stand behind her! I have been following this case for a long time, and this is the first time I have seen the UFT comment on her behalf. I guess, better late than never! Now when the hell are the jackasses at the DOE going to put this FINE TEACHER back in a classroom, where she belongs?!!!!

  4. 

    We all deserve a private and personnel life, the union needs to step up and take action to compel the DOE to reinstate Christine Rubino

  5. 

    The Union needs to step up and support their workers!!! Christine has suffered long enough, she put up a good fight & she has persevered!! She is an amazingly strong woman & I can’t wait to hear that she is back in the classroom!!!

  6. 
    southbronxschool May 14, 2013 at 9:43 am

    How many computers/laptops/tablets could that $32 million of bought?

  7. 
    Audrey D'Andrea May 14, 2013 at 11:19 am

    How much more should Christine Rubino and her family have to endure? For 2 years her talent as an educator has been wasted along with precious time and money. She stood her ground and was sometimes alone in her fight for justice even when she was discouraged from doing so. Her perseverance is admirable. Her situation should be a lesson to anyone who has ever made an inappropriate comment.(haven’t we all at one time or another???) One comment doesn’t negate a lifetime of accomplishment and the Union needs to step up and push the DOE until Christine is back where she belongs…in the classroom.

  8. 

    Did anyone find it strange that the recent teacher survey included a question about whether teachers were considering leaving the profession?

    I was wondering whether this was being asked to prevent teachers leaving, or if they were trying to measure how successful recent events have been in discouraging and disillusioning working teachers so they can get younger, cheaper teachers.

    An administrator in my school has been repeatedly saying that we might be in wrong profession during staff meetings. One example was if we are not willing to confront students who are trying to exit the room without permission, we are not cut out for teaching.

  9. 

    MORE should take on this issue in a more systematic , serious and pointed way. We all know that the current regime (DOE) is systematically trying to break both the union and the profession. Examples like Rubino, Lirtzman, Portelos abound.

    Remember: the people who actually fight back are the almost imperceptibly tiny tip of the iceberg. They’re the only people we ever hear about. Few have the $$$ or the stomach to take it to the court system. As *individuals*. They’d rather just go drive a cab. At least that way they have a *chance* to pay their rent.

    Again: “As *individuals*.” The bureaucracy counts on this. It also counts on Trojan Horse ploys like the Danielson Framework…which is , as employed by DOE, an eminently portable Hostile Work Environment. Truly a godsend, from its POV.

    I recommend the establishment of a MORE task force or working group devoted to studying these issue, (i.e. the issue raised by Rubino, Lirtzman, Portelos and many others : that is to say, the abuse, and misuse of the investigative and disciplinary apparatus) in isolation from the rest of the MORE platform, and making planning recommendations based on its study.

  10. 

    Very happy to hear Christine’s battle finally went her way. How many teachers would have simply done as the DOE wanted and caved in? I thank her and her supporters for hanging in there and fighting these phonies on their own terms. I especially thank her for whipping their asses at their own stupid game. To err is human to come back and redeem yourself is inspiration to us all. Much Peace, Love Respect and Strength to Christine and her band of brothers and sisters who introduced me to the story and kept me informed as it unravelled so spectacularly in the faces of her tormentors. Now reinstate her and pay up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s