For Deion


This is a personal statement by a member of MORE. It may or may not represent the official view of the MORE caucus.

By Julie Cavanagh

Teacher/Chapter Leader P.S.15k

One year ago I received a phone call from a former student. After a few exchanged pleasantries he interrupted me to say, “Deion is dead”.  My heart sank, a lump formed in my throat, and I listened to what is an increasingly all too familiar story of a young black man dying during a low-level police interaction.

Deion and his girlfriend swiped into the subway on one metro card. Deion was headed back to Red Hook from his girlfriend’s neighborhood. She was keeping him company on the platform, which is why she didn’t swipe a separate metro card. The police approached Deion and his girlfriend and confronted them about swiping only once. What happened next is not exactly clear, but Deion ran, was chased, eventually was caught, ended up a quadriplegic and later died from his injuries. The police reported he had been clipped by a train, but before he died, Deion told his side of the story in detail, which included no run in with a train but rather being brutally beaten by the police. The value of Deion’s life it would seem was a mere $2.50.

I have never written or taken action publicly out of respect for Mrs. Fludd who as his mother made deeply personal decisions about how to handle Deion’s death including taking time for her and her family to heal. Mrs. Fludd has since spoken publicly and has given me permission to do so.

In the last month five unarmed black men have been killed by police officers: Eric Garner, John Crawford, Ezell Ford, Michael Brown and Dante Parker

Since the start of the Iraq war 4488 American soldiers have been killed. During the same time period,  5000 American citizens have been killed at the hands of the police.

In the last decade hundreds of black men have died at the hands of the police. Today there are more American citizens in the prison system in the United States than the citizens in any other developed nation, including China.

Stating these facts does not mean I am anti-police officer. But they send a loud and clear message that there is a problem with policing in our country, a problem that disproportionately affects people of color, especially black men, and puts the freedom and liberty of every United States citizen in jeopardy.

So why is this an issue teachers, and their unions, must be vocal about?  Eric Garner’s children and grandchildren have attended, attend and will attend public schools.  Deion and Michael Brown were public school students.  If their teachers cannot be counted on to stand with them, to fight for them, who can they count on?

As educators and public servants who navigate public spaces and have an implicit stewardship over our nation’s youth, we stand positioned closest to our communities and the fight for racial, social and economic justice.  If not us, than who, if not now, then when?

A firestorm has erupted in recent days that has played out on the pages of newspapers, social media, and countless emails between educators, politicians, and community leaders about the UFT’s support and sponsorship of A March for Justice.  There are plenty of critiques and voices expressing a range of opinions from criticism of Al Sharpton, to the UFT’s democratic decision making (or lack thereof), to branding it as anti-police.  Let’s be clear:  Eric Garner’s family, his wife, children and grandchildren left behind, will be leading this march. Is any one of us prepared to look them in the eye and say, “I will not stand with you.”?  I, for one, am not.

Educators have an important place, in standing for justice for all.  We must recognize that we have a broken justice system in this country that disproportionately targets and consumes people of color, especially black men.

Our police officers have the immense challenge and responsibility to protect and serve our citizens, all of them, and the majority do their best.  Like PBA president Lynch, I believe in due process and I firmly believe our brave men and women in uniform do not leave their homes and families each day to kill, harass, or wrongly imprison their fellow citizens, but the reality is these things are happening, in alarming numbers, and we have an opportunity, due to the long overdue attention these tragedies are receiving today, for systemic change and healing tomorrow.

As I understand the march this Saturday, the demand is transparency, accountability, and an effort to raise awareness for the kinds of policing changes that are needed, here in New York City, and more broadly.  I understand the tensions and political posturing that make this issue “complicated”, but we cannot be deterred or divided from a common cause:  a better world where all of our citizens are treated equally and humanely.

At the center of many of the recent tragedies, the “broken windows” policy of policing and the conscious or unconscious targeting, assumption of guilt and fear of  black men has come into focus.

We cannot stand by silent at this pivotal moment for something good to come out of the needless deaths of countless men like Eric Garner and Deion Fludd.  Rather, we must stand together and demand change.  This is where Mr. Lynch and I diverge.

I ran against Michael Mulgrew in the last UFT election.  I was prepared to serve and represent my fellow educators as the president of one of the largest union locals in the country.  In that role, difficult decisions must be made, and sometimes those decisions must be made quickly.  Rather than blaming and criticizing everyone from Mr. Garner himself, to the medical examiner who ruled Garner’s death a homicide, to Michael Mulgrew, Mr. Lynch would better serve his members, and our city, by standing with the Garner family.  Compassion, understanding, and a commitment to improve relationships and policy is the responsibility of not only a union leader, but of all of us.

There is plenty of room for debate as to the policy solutions that will serve all of our citizenry, but there is no debate that a father and grandfather should not be left to die on a Staten Island sidewalk because, in the past, he sold loosies.  There is no debate that a seventeen year old making his way home, should not become a quadrapalegic and later die, because he and his girlfriend swiped a metrocard once, not twice.

Yes both men resisted arrest, but wouldn’t you if you felt you were being wrongly arrested?  Resisting arrest should not equal a death sentence.

This week I have the honor of driving the young man who called to tell me about Deion’s death and Deion’s brother to college.  Their journey is a light in the darkness of recent and historical tragedy.  My husband and I will return with our son on Friday, will wake Saturday morning, and join the family of Eric Garner and Deion Fludd in a march for justice and change.

I will explain to my blue-eyed white-skinned son that an injustice to one, is an injustice to us all.  I will tell him that the police, like his uncles, are here to protect us and serve us, and hopefully he will never need their help, but if he does, they will be there.  I will tell him that sometimes people do bad things, whether they mean to or not, and there are consequences for every choice we make.  I will explain that not everyone has his privilege, and with privilege comes an even greater responsibility to fight for justice, equal treatment under the law, and a better world for all.

I will tell him to look over at Karen Fludd, Deion’s mother who we will be marching with, and tell her that her son was loved, that his life matters, and our lives are best spent fighting for the promise of a better world where her pain will never again exist.

Comments are welcome, please reply with your respectful thoughts below.

11 thoughts on “For Deion

  1. Question: If we lived in an alternate reality where MORE had won the UFT election, would you commit the entire rank and file to this march, without delegate input? A march that would be divisive because of the inclusion of a very polarizing religious/political leader who has made a name for himself off of the tragedy of others while spewing anti-Semitic rhetoric?

  2. Your statement is well thought out and beautifully written. However, the UFT didn’t pole us and is in effect, having one union take a public stand against another. Al Sharpton is anti-Semitic, anti-white and does not believe in unity. He is using our union for political gains.

    1. Thanks for your thoughts, Lynn. Certainly, there are many reasons to have critiques of Sharpton (most important for us, he has been a prominent supporter of charters). And our union certainly did not have a particularly democratic process in deciding how to get involved (as it rarely does). However, this march about the Garner case and the Garner family – and some (but not all) MOREistas feel that that outweighs their reservations about the situations behind the march. See our latest post for our official statement on the question:

  3. If and when we do win we would like to believe our first policy change would be to make the union more member driven. Any major positions our union takes or major policy shifts would have to go through a membership vote. We would never have our union endorse or sponsor anything without membership approval, but in the summer that may not be realistic. There has to be a democratic process for every decision the union makes on our behalf. There is an elected executive board that is supposed to make day to day decisions. Unfortunately, it currently only consists of Unity and New Action elected delegates, both of which supported Mulgrew. At the very least, MORE would have called an executive board meeting and allowed for ample time to discuss and debate. It would have also been an open invite for UFT rank and file members, well advertised by membership emails, texts, and social media. There would have been “open mic” time where members could have expressed their opinions and after hearing the sentiments of the members, the elected MORE members of the executive board, who have no party oath they have to adhere to, would have voted.

  4. Thank you, Julie. The issues about UFT—-which are real—-and about Sharpton—also real—-can not be allowed to divert attention to the purpose of the rally. You beautifully express our obligation as educators. As a resident of Staten Island, I must stand with this family and this community and join their demand for justice for all.

  5.                                                     Sorry to learn of your student’s passing. As a society, we cannot march against the police. This is why Unity Caucus has remained in power for over 40 years and that all opposition parties shall continue to lose in UFT elections. You take side issues and make them at the forefront. With discipline a major problem, we need the police. We can’t afford to alienate them. Our problems stem from people showing no respect for authority. As educators, we see this in the schools each day.Students see they may get away with anything. When they leave school, they think this shall continue until they meet up with authority.                               THE UFT HAS NO BUSINESS PARTICIPATING IN AN ANTI-POLICE RALLY. SOME EXAMPLE WE ARE SETTING FOR STUDENTS. JUST AWFUL THAT THE UNION WILL ALLY THEMSELVES WITH AL SHARPTON, A KNOWN ANTI-SEMITE.                                                                                                         

    On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:44 AM, Movement of Rank and File Educators wrote:

    morecaucusnyc posted: ”

    This is a personal statement by a member of MORE. It may or may not represent the official view of the MORE caucus.

    By Julie Cavanagh

    Teacher/Chapter Leader P.S.15k

    One year ago I received a phone call from a former student. After a few excha”

    1. Thank you Edward for your comment. The march on Saturday is not against the police, it is against police brutality and the killing of an unarmed man in police custody. Struggling against this type of injustice on Saturday is something that some (but not all) MOREistas are supporting as an example for, and in solidarity with, their students and the communities we serve. Please see our official statement on the march

  6. Thank you for your insightful and moving piece. As teachers we have a special responsibility to our students. The NYPD policies of “Stop and Frisk” and “Broken Windows” have had a disastrous impact on young people of color–the majority of students in our school system Some people call these policies the “school to prison pipeline” or in way too many cases “the way to death.”

    Whether the UFT should endorse marches and other actions against very harmful police practices I do not know. However, I think spreading the word about what affects our students deeply is a proper response for our union.

    1. Thank you for your comment, Sharon. The UFT has participated in other anti-police brutality efforts in the past, around the cases of Amadou Diallo, Sean Bell and the silent 2012 Father’s Day March against police brutality.

  7. When rules are not followed people die. It is our jOb as teachers and parents to instill this value in our kids. Deion was a sweet boy who ran because he was scared. His resulting injuries and tragic death were brought about by not following rules. I find this essay beautiful in intention but disregards the reasons behind police actions. The fault usually sadly lies on the poor, young scared kids running, struggling away from authority not the police.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: