The Miseducation of UFT Leadership


Dear UFT Leadership

By Jia Lee

There have been several points along my 14 years as a public school special education teacher when I felt I’d had enough. Many teachers across the country are fleeing the profession, retiring as soon as possible and publicly stating why. When I presented my reasons for becoming a conscientious objector to high stakes testing before the US Senate, some may have viewed it as a risky step, but for me, it was a moment of absolute clarity. The “I Refuse” Resolution reclaims our pedagogical and professional rights and values. It is why over forty locals across New York State have passed this exact resolution. It supports the values of Teachers of Conscience and initiates a means of directly countering Governor Cuomo’s education proposals with the moral force of teachers acting as individuals and collectively in the interests of their students and themselves.

We are at an unprecedented time of policy-making in education that is being driven by those who have very little or no experience teaching. Some of us have joined grassroots groups to organize forums to educate the public about our work and why their children are more than a test score. Sadly, we must also educate the leadership of the largest and most influential local teachers union in the world. At the United Federation of Teachers Delegate Assembly on February 11, 2015, Sterling Roberson, the Vice President of Career and Technical Education stated, in opposition to the resolution, “… the union is against over-testing, but testing is important for parents to know where their child is compared to other children.” The goal and purpose of education in this day and age, we would hope, is to prepare our students to collaborate with each other to solve the immense problems our world faces. We work with beautifully diverse student populations, whose strengths and talents should never be used to compare, rank, sort and place labels based on faulty, opaque metrics.

Mr. Roberson used the term “diagnostic,” as if these tests are being used to provide some kind of useful information that would inform our instruction, or as he put it, “Tell parents where their children are.”  Where has he been? Teachers no longer have access to the tests, and scores arrive at the end of the year. We no longer have the ability to know how our students answered, let alone have the ability to engage in any kind of meaningful dialogue around the items. They are useless for the purposes of teaching and learning. That is because they are not meant to be diagnostic. The sole purpose of the tests is to evaluate teachers. There is ample research which demonstrates that these tests are not indicators of school, teacher or student success or failure. In fact, they are indicators of students’ socioeconomic status, access to resources and other outside-of-school factors. High stakes tests are not diagnostic: they are tools for profit and managing the teaching workforce, made possible by alignment with the Common Core and a climate of rigid enforcement that is taking over our public schools.

Diagnostic exams in schools can be thought of as akin to those used in medicine. Various tools are used to assess a patient’s condition, and physicians often use more than one tool to synthesize the outcomes, in order to provide a comprehensive diagnosis that suggests a path for treatment. The information is immediate and informs professional judgement about the patient’s condition and possible ways of treating them. Imagine if the results of X-rays were not made available to doctors or their patients until months later, and the results came in the form of a 4, 3, 2 or 1. I’d hope that Sterling Roberson himself would say this type of practice is medically useless, if not dangerous.

To continue with this analogy, imagine the X-rays were then viewed by a minimally-trained temp hired by a major corporation with other financial interests in this field, which then determines the score as an indicator of the doctor’s ability to practice medicine. It is absurd, and a danger to both patient and doctor. How out of touch from what is happening in schools and classrooms has our leadership become that they refuse to acknowledge the obvious faults in their own arguments?

It is time for our union leadership to acknowledge that hundreds of thousands of teachers are in fight or flight mode. The moment of clarity for me came two years ago, when one of my most creative and hard working students suddenly scratched into her test booklet, “Dear Testing People, I hate writing because of this test.” Before she could let out another painful word, I gently pulled away her test booklet. When the extended testing time was up, I showed her the notebooks filled with stories she had written and responses to her reading that led to her typing book reviews on several major online platforms. Her test form indicated the “999” refusal. This beautiful little girl is more than a test score and always will be.

We need our union leadership to be an integral part of educating the public, so that the promise of public education, which we all know is still an aspiration, can be realized. However, it seems that they first need a lesson on the intended purposes, workings and consequences of these tests for students and teachers.

If they’re unwilling to learn, then they should step aside and let rank and file teachers speak and act for themselves and their students.


12 thoughts on “The Miseducation of UFT Leadership

  1. Excellent piece. And, thank you for testifying in front of the US Senate. Many teachers who understand true leadership were extremely impressed.

  2. I’m sure they’re glad so many teachers are resigning. The better to keep/attract the sheep who stay. Every teacher who leaves should have an exit interview. If the district doesn’t do it, the union should — and document all the reasons WHY a teacher finds it necessary to leave the profession.

  3. Three people packed it in the end of January. Get out of the way the stampede in June!
    And many thanks for your courage in representing us at D.C.

    1. Mulgarten/Weingrew was inadvertently speaking the truth, a rarity, when he said that, admitting that he was in the pocket of Gates and the other so-called reformers, and that he actually believes their destructive nonsense.

      In fact, for the better part of twenty years, they have accepted the premises of the edu-privateers, and see their job as one of managing, rather than representing, the rank and file. Whatever the issue is – Common Core, Danielson, high stakes testing, Mayoral Control, charter schools, etc. – they’ve been on the wrong side, their actions belying their weak political theater and deceptive words, and provide support for the hostile takeover of public education.

  4. “High stakes,” criterion-reference tests cannot be competently used for diagnostic purposes – ever! This isn’t even statistics, just algebra. Teachers who complain about them are like Canadians (or New Englanders) complaining about snow. We (I’m a public school special education teacher) need to understand tests, what they are & what they (don’t) measure. If we don’t have the money to fight back, lets eviscerate the testing interests with our knowledge of mathematics (real statistics) and precise English; at least let’s try. Is our ministry more concerned about the congregation in the pews or the larger one outside?

  5. Wonderfully inspiring, Jia. You fuel our tanks for more fight!

    I like the medical analogy. I have used it comparing Bergtraum HS to a general hospital that is inundated with emergency room patients (high need students) but is not given any additional supports for expanded ICU care with the expectation all patients will walk away healthy (career and college ready).

    The UFT leadership only cares about one thing- DUES. I believe a deal between Weingarten and Bloomberg must have been struck- Just give the UFT a no layoff clause (laid off teachers don’t pay union dues) and the DoE can go after the teachers with impunity, via U ratings, etc. It’s not a coincidence that a new teacher pays the same amount in dues as an experienced teacher. Hence, what’s the UFT’s incentive to protect senior members?

    I have experienced dozens of times how the grievance process is a dead end. It leads members on to think they have rights. But, when you grieve for those rights you find out that beyond Step 2 there is nothing for 90 percent of the cases. Principals know this. My own principal took away my .2 so I have to teach 5 instead of 4. She has learned it will be a year or more before it goes to arbitration. I will have ended my tenure as chapter leader by then. The UFT takes just enough cases to keep fooling the members that the have rights. But, it is the illusion of due diligence. The grievance process need to be sped up and real hearing officers, not rubber stamps for principals, need to be deciding Step 2s. Until that happens, we, in effect, have no rights.

    It’s no surprise, therefore, that the UFT has no stance on standardized testing. It just follows and jumps on the bandwagon claiming they were there all along.

    John Elfrank-Dana
    Chapter Leader, Murry Bergtraum High School

    1. Are you suggesting that union leaders wait until overwhelming public pressure threatens to make policymakers unpopular…then leap to the front with johnny-come-lately rallying cries and slogans-calling for members to come together as if inactivity was their fault all along?

    2. Just as with their de facto endorsements of Bloomberg in ’09 and out Reptilian Governor in ’14, their “no stance” on high stakes testing effectively is support for it.

  6. Great piece Jia. You hit the nail on the head to point out that Roberson uses the language of the reformers – “diagnostic” “to know where their children are compared to other children.” It’s as if Gates himself were at the DA. No matter that none of this is true; he is not speaking for teachers nor is he speaking for parents. The one good thing that will come from this opposition vote to a resolution so badly needed, is that it makes crystal clear for all to see the UFT leadership for what it really is – part of the corporate reform machine. As if more proof were needed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: