Archives For teachers voice
The Movement of Rank and File Educators (MORE-UFT) voted unanimously at our last General Body meeting to propose that the United Federation of Teachers, instead of sitting out this gubernatorial race, endorse the pro-public education platform presented by Howie Hawkins for Governor and Brian Jones for Lieutenant Governor.
MORE prepared to present a resolution at Wednesday’s Delegate Assembly. The UFT leadership, however, did not allow this discussion. Despite being informed in advance that MORE chapter leaders and delegates intended to raise this resolution for debate and voting, UFT leadership called time on the ten-minute new motion period, thus prohibiting this conversation. In fact, though Michael Mulgrew’s President’s Report was longer than 45 minutes, there was no mention of this Governor’s race.
Though UFT and NYSUT leadership remain silent regarding the upcoming Gubernatorial race, we pledge go to the polls and vote for the only public school positive, teacher-and-student friendly candidates in this race. We encourage fellow friends of public education to join us in voting Hawkins/Jones!
Why? Here are just a few of the many reasons:
- Both Andrew Cuomo and Rob Astorino vocally support the privatization of education through the expansion of charter schools. In contrast, the Green Party ticket of Howie Hawkins and Brian Jones opposes charter schools.
- Andrew Cuomo has pushed through an expansion of testing statewide and the punitive linking of test scores to teacher evaluations. The Hawkins/Jones ticket opposes an emphasis on high stakes testing.
- Andrew Cuomo implemented a destructive tax cap that has forced massive layoffs of teachers in upstate districts.
- New York State AFL-CIO and the New York State United Teachers (NYSUT) have declined to endorse Cuomo because of his anti-education policies.
- Many of our Union and Education Allies have endorsed the Hawkins/Jones Ticket, including: The Buffalo Teachers Federation, Port Jefferson Station Teachers Association, East Williston Teachers Association, Lakeland Federation of Teachers, Diane Ravitch, the Coalition for Public Education, the Independent Commission on Public Education and three local NYC Democratic clubs.
- Astorino and Cuomo are both millionaires while Hawkins and Jones are both union activists, Hawkins in Teamsters, Jones in the UFT and PSC.
- The Hawkins/Jones platform of a Green New Deal calls for
- equitable funding for all of our schools,
- reduced class sizes across the state,
- support for programs that promote desegregation in our schools,
- an end to zero-tolerance discipline policies driving the school-to-prison pipeline,
- and allowing schools to develop methods of assessment organic to the learning process.
- To learn more, Read their letter to teachers here, and spread the word using the voter guide below.
|MORE/UFT Caucus Pro-Education Positions||Hawkins/ Jones (Green)||Cuomo(Dem.)||Astorino(Rep.)|
|Against the Expansion of Charter Schools||✓|
|Against High Stakes Testing, Against APPR (New teacher evals) / Supports Parents & Students’ Right to Opt Out of High Stakes Tests||✓||✓|
|Against Common Core?||✓||✓|
|Union member or Millionaire Candidates?||Union||Millionaire||Millionaire|
|Fight corporate ed deform by rescinding NY’s Race to the Top application and replacing NYSED commissioner John King||✓||✓|
|Tax Top 5% and Eliminate State Property Tax Cap to Fund Schools||✓|
|Supports unionism, social movements and a $15/hr minimum wage||✓|
Don’t sit this election out, vote for a real change in Education Policy! Vote Hawkins/Jones!
Special Education Teacher/UFT Delegate
PS 58, Carroll Gardens, Brooklyn
Lest we forget, the UFT leadership works for the membership- NOT the other way around.
Our dues pay for their salaries, their perks, and the UFT skyscraper at 52 Broadway. Our COPE money buys the “seat at the table” with the politicians, billionaires, and power brokers they say will save our profession. They push a TINA (There Is No Alternative) mentality on the membership, and when it comes to the 2014 contract, operatives (belonging to the UNITY caucus that has monopolized power within the UFT since its founding in 1960) have been sent out among the membership. Their message is that this proposal is the best we can do, so even if you have lots of problems with it, it’s better than no contract at all, so you might as well vote “yes”.
Most working teachers in NYC have been kept in the dark about how their union works, and how that relates to this contract, so perhaps it’s helpful to reframe the question in terms of dining in a restaurant:
Let’s say you sat down at a table, ordered, and were served a dish that looked, smelled, and tasted awful. Would you choke it down because that’s what you had been brought? Since you are paying the restaurant for the sole purpose of preparing you a tasty meal, most people would send it back and expect the restaurant to replace it with something better.
What if everyone’s meal was unacceptable, and the manager sent around the maitre d’ to explain to each table that the restaurant’s suppliers sold substandard meat and produce, so there was no way they could produce a tastier meal, but that surely, eating what they had brought you was better than no meal at all?